SENT from KENT
I found my earliest ancestor in Kent,
Hadlow to be exact. Here, in 1809, I
find the family of Thomas Daws (my 3G-GF) and wife Elizabeth Whitebread with
three children, William aged 5, Jane Ann aged 3 and Susan aged 2. The reason I was able to find them was they
were ordered back to Uckfield in Sussex by a removal order dated 9
August 1809. Thomas was an agricultural
labourer and I have labelled him as ‘Thomas the Labourer’ because I descend
from a whole line of Thomas’. I also
have Thomas the Bricklayer (my 2G-GF) and Thomas the Builder (my G-GF).
Thomas, the Labourer, married Elizabeth in Tudeley and
Capel on 8 March 1804. The Whitebread’s
are an old Kent
family and they have been in Hadlow a while, at least, since 1700 according to
my research. Henry Whitebread, who would
be my sixth great-grandfather, was buried there on the 13th of May
1752. I’m assuming that this would be in
the St. Mary’s churchyard although I have no
proof of this.
Why did Thomas and Elizabeth marry in Tudeley
and Capel although the twin parishes are adjacent to Hadlow? Maybe the church was closer to where they
were working. I’m assuming that Elizabeth was pregnant
when they married as their first child, William, was baptized in Hadlow on 12
April 1804 just a little over a month after their marriage.
The Daws’ family weren’t very
obedient. They managed to have my second
great-grandfather, Thomas the Bricklayer, baptised in Hadlow on 12 November
1809 a full three months after the order.
But wait, they also had Sarah baptised on 3 November 1811 more than two
years later and still in Hadlow. Did
Thomas find work which would have negated the need for them to remove to
Uckfield? Elizabeth was from Hadlow so why were the
poor law overseers so keen to have them gone, not that they rushed to leave.
Next they appear in East Peckham, not
Uckfield as you might expect. Frances, a
daughter, is baptised there on 6 December 1814, then Elizabeth is baptised on 1 December 1816
still in East Peckham then Mary on 27 June 1819 and finally George on the 6
January 1822. George is the last of the
East Peckham children so their dalliance on the way to Uckfield added another
four children to the family. As you’ll
see later, William, their oldest even gets married in East Peckham before they
leave.
Finally, in 1829, a daughter, Harriet, is
baptised in Holy Cross Church ,
Uckfield on the first of March. Elizabeth would have been
forty-four so it’s not unreasonable to assume that this is her child but they
also had three daughters over eighteen so Harriet may have been a
granddaughter. Harriet does list Thomas
the Labourer as her father on her marriage registration in 1856 so there’s not
proof either way.
The family is last found in East Peckham in
1822 and then in Uckfield in 1829 leaving a seven year span during which they
could have moved or removed. The 1831
census for Uckfield, which was published by PBN Publications in 1988, shows two
Daws families living together at Grants Hill with a total of eight females and
eight males. This matches my tally for
Thomas living with his older son, William, and their combined spouses and
children.
William has been a real pain! He married an Elizabeth
in East Packham around about 1826 so that may
make the Daws departure later than I thought. I have never found a marriage or Banns for
William and Elizabeth. Elizabeth dutifully reports East Peckham as
her birth place on every census from 1841 to 1861. Her death in 1867 doesn’t record any family other
than her deceased husband and a neighbour who was the informant. I have tried to reverse engineer her surname
from all the available Elizabeth ’s
of which there are ten born between 1803 and 1805 in East Peckham which
corresponds to her census reported age.
The Daws’ did not follow any naming
convention with their children as is found with many English and Scottish
families in the 18th and 19th centuries. This means that I can’t predict her parents
forenames from the names William and she gave to their children. I find it irritating that I have the family
so well documented from about 1873 with this one missing bit that I can’t fill
in. It also makes me feel that I haven’t
properly recognized Elizabeth
even though she’s only related to me tangentially. As I work on my family history, I like to
believe that I am remembering each ancestor I record and acknowledging their
contribution to the family fabric. I
hope a future descendant of mine feels the same way when they discover me. Maybe through this article?
William and Elizabeth’s first child,
Elizabeth, was baptised in East Peckham in 1828 while their second child,
Henry, was baptised in Uckfield in 1831 which narrows the move date even
further to sometime between 1828 and 1831.
I don’t know if his parents moved first , vice versa or all
together. The only thing I am reasonably
sure of is they are living together in Uckfield by 1831.
While daughter Elizabeth was born in East
Peckham and moved to Uckfield she is the only child of the whole family group
to return to Kent . She married George Gurr, a native of Isfield , Sussex
in 1850 in Uckfield but returned to Penshurst between 1871 and 1881 where they
both died.
From this point on the family are stationed
in Uckfield , Sussex
eventually migrating to Brighton where Thomas
the Builder became a prominent house builder with over one hundred houses to
his credit. In fact, if anyone is
familiar with the Cutress’s or Round Hill Mill which was purchased by Thomas
who used the 50,000 bricks for building fourteen houses on Belton Road . The lumber was used for the window sashes and
the metal was sold for scrap. My
grandfather Tom (not Thomas) inherited two of these houses but sadly they were
sold shortly after his death in 1933.
The rest of the story is in Sussex .